It did not take long for the group of angry Democrats from Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s team to break their silence and start leaking.
Federalist Papers reports:
And the angry Democrats are saying that the information in the report is more damaging to President Donald Trump than Attorney General Bill Barr let on.
But that does not change the ultimate conclusion of the report being that there was no collusion between the campaign and Russia, The Hill reported.
Some members of special counsel Robert Mueller’s team have said Attorney General William Barr’s summary of their report did not sufficiently portray the results of their investigation, suggesting their findings could be more damaging to President Trump than Barr conveyed, The New York Times reported Wednesday.
The Times, citing government officials and others familiar with the matter, reported that members of the special counsel’s team have expressed concerns that Barr’s summary of their office’s findings helped solidify the views of the American public prior to the investigation’s conclusions being made public.
Investigators on Mueller’s team reportedly prepared summaries of their probe, and some feel that Barr should have included more information from their summaries in his own outline of the report’s findings. However, the Justice Department determined those summaries contained sensitive information that could not be released, according to two government officials who spoke to the Times.
The officials and others did not fully explain to the Times why the investigators believe their findings are worse for the president than Barr indicated. It also is not clear how many of the 19 lawyers, approximately 40 FBI agents and other people on Mueller’s team share this sentiment about Barr’s summary.
That information is extremely important. No idea how many of them are angry and they were not specific about what they did not like.
It sounds a lot like some people are angry that after all of their hard work they could not find any collusion between Trump and Russia.
The angry Democrats from the Mueller Team are no leaking. What a stunner. And there is still #NoCollusion.
— Carmine Sabia (@CarmineSabia) April 4, 2019
Remember this: For two years, nobody on the Mueller team ever leaked. Nobody. Until now.
— Joe Walsh (@WalshFreedom) April 4, 2019
For 2 years the Mueller Team did not leak. Now it appears some of them are speaking. They must be deeply disturbed by what Barr did. @HouseJudiciary today authorized our Chair to issue a subpoena for the Mueller Report. We hope we don’t have to use it. But we will if necessary. https://t.co/OGNx9pmrOx
— Ted Lieu (@tedlieu) April 4, 2019
The entire Mueller probe was a sham from the start. There’s no way that the Mueller team really believed that they were investigating Russian collusion with the Trump team. There’s no way they were that ignorant. This was a tax-payer funded political investigation, nothing more.
— Dan Bongino (@dbongino) April 3, 2019
Extraordinary we are hearing any comments from anyone on #Mueller team even with several degrees of separation after two years of completely disciplined silence – one can infer that their concerns must be profound. #Trump https://t.co/sFOctlp33Y
— Shanlon Wu (@shanlonwu) April 4, 2019
Some of the Mueller team were frustrated when they found out in July 2017 that there were no collusion to get @realDonaldTrump on, so they tried a bogus obstruction case with no merit and at the end they were not happy at all.
— JL Jules (@jljules1979) April 4, 2019
A.G. Barr lied on report, mueller Team speaking out and will testify with Congress soon. There was no proven collusion, but we all know he did. Report is strongly with Evidence of Obstruction. which is Impeachable. https://t.co/X3l5bcIzaT
— Martin Escalante (@FOLKVANG13) April 4, 2019
The Mueller Team found absolutely no evidence of Trump/Russia Collusion. Passed the buck on Obstruction. So obviously they didn’t have much.
If any of the angry Democrats have a problem with that…let em show their faces on T.V. I’m sure the #Fakenews would love to have them.
— ❌ Unnamed Source ❌ (@Gregmichael78) April 4, 2019
From Federalist Papers