Supreme Court ruled 8-1 last year that First Amendment plaintiffs can seek “nominal damages” without showing measurable economic harm.
College officials twice shut down Uzuegbunam for evangelizing on campus, first for proselytizing without a permit and then for drawing complaints from passers-by — even though he obtained a permit for proselytizing.
Bradford alleged his evangelism was unconstitutionally chilled because of the actions against Uzuegbunam, though the settlement was reached before the trial court could determine whether he had “established a past, completed injury.”
After first comparing evangelism to “fighting words”, the college changed its free-speech policies and tried to dismiss the lawsuit as moot, saying nominal damages alone weren’t enough to sustain litigation. A cross-ideological coalition sided with the students, and SCOTUS agreed.
A federal trial court rejected the college’s motion to dismiss the case as moot after paying nominal damages in December.
ADF Senior Counsel Travis Barham called the settlement a victory for “many other students who wish to exercise their constitutionally protected freedoms” at Georgia public colleges. Thanks to the trial court ruling, “the college has finally decided to stop fighting the Constitution,” he said.
