DuckDuckGo ‘is now in the censorship business’: Will Penalize Sites ‘Associated With Disinformation’

“At DuckDuckGo, we’ve been rolling out search updates that down-rank sites associated with Russian disinformation,” he added.
DuckDuckGo is also placing boxes with information at the top of the search results page “to highlight quality information for rapidly unfolding topics,” Weinberg added.

In addition to down-ranking sites associated with disinformation, we also often place news modules and information boxes at the top of DuckDuckGo search results (where they are seen and clicked the most) to highlight quality information for rapidly unfolding topics.

— Gabriel Weinberg (@yegg) March 10, 2022

DuckDuckGo’s mission is to make simple privacy protection accessible to all. Privacy is a human right and transcends politics, which is why about 100 million people around the world use DuckDuckGo. (We don’t have an exact count since we don’t track people.)

— Gabriel Weinberg (@yegg) March 10, 2022

DuckDuckGo is an alternative to Google that has been growing in popularity in recent years in part because it doesn’t track users. Weinberg has in the past promised “unbiased results” as part of his pitch to people to switch from Google.

Some users quickly questioned the CEO’s update, including Tom Fitton, president of the Judicial Watch nonprofit.

DuckDuckGo, “contrary to its implicit promises to the contrary, is now in the censorship business,” he wrote on Twitter. “Are there any search engines that respect users?”

.@DuckDuckGo, contrary to its implicit promises to the contrary, is now in the censorship business. Are there any search engines that respect users? https://t.co/uUvzKhI5YQ

— Tom Fitton (@TomFitton) March 10, 2022

“Today, you are removing Russian disinformation Tomorrow you will be removing genuine protests,” another user wrote.

Disinformation like the Russian bounty story? Or that drone strike that killed kids? Or Jussie Smollette? Or the Covington kids hoax?

— Cernovich (@Cernovich) March 10, 2022

I understand your good intentions but not interfering like Google does to pick what’s disinformation and what’s not is why people use your product. Without that freedom you’re just baby Google. Please rethink this.

— Robby Starbuck (@robbystarbuck) March 10, 2022

Agreed. There should be an emergency executive/board meeting in response to this and a 180 degree reversal.

— Larry Sanger (@lsanger) March 10, 2022