The Liberty Bugle

Liberals Furious With Media For Covering Democrat Freshman’s Outrageous “Motherf*cker” Tirade

By

As we’ve already covered, a freshman House Democrat thrilled a room full of left-wing activists last week when she relayed a story about telling her young son — classy! —  that her party was going to “impeach the motherf***er,” in a reference to President Trump.

She ended her speech with that pungent line, and the assembled crowd went wild.  In case you somehow missed it, watch:

 

Townhall reports:

My reaction to profanity like this is not overly puritanical, if I’m honest.  Indeed, my favorite all-time Charles Krauthammer column was, “in defense of the F-word.”  I find much of the performative Republican pearl-clutching about the use of a bad word in this context to be inauthentic and contrived.  After all, the current Republican president famously revels in vulgarity, so nobody is in much of a position to lecture anyone else on dignified comportment these days.  I do, however, want to make three points: First, in spite of what I’ve already written, I hope we can reach a nonpartisan consensus that publicly calling any President of the United States that word is manifestly inappropriate is disrespectful to the office.  And no, this was not a ‘private’ remark, as some apologists have tried to spin it:

She was addressing a large crowd, with phones out and reporters present.  She knew damn well that what she said would become public.  On Twitter, she’s flexing about speaking “truth to power” or whatever, but she’s literally running away from journalists’ questions about what she said.  My view is that if you’re going to refer to the president as a “motherf***er,” you should either apologize, or fully and shamelessly own it.  The original outburst was unseemly, and the aftermath has been weak.  President Trump has not “met his match,” it appears.  Second, quite a few liberals have been whining about the press over-covering this incident.  They’re upset that other Democrats are being asked about a fellow elected official’s comment, squealing with frustration that their party is sometimes treated even somewhat similarly to Republicans.  Here’s a former journalist turned lefty activist leading the chorus:

Another similar, stupid complaint:

 

The notion that the media is too supine and accommodating to Republicans — and President Trump in particular — is absolutely ludicrous.  And very few people believe it, including people who’ve witnessed the bias from the inside.  It’s revealing, however, that a former CNN anchor believes that reporting on this story is a media failure (coinciding with the bogus premise that the press was too tough on Hillary in 2016), and that running an op/ed criticizing a member of Congress for dropping the MF-bomb about Trump is “sucky” coverage.  She would apparently prefer undisguised activism to journalism, which may help explain her career trajectory.  Also, it’s bonkers to suggest that Republican politicians aren’t subject to “will you denounce?” questions and challenges.  They are.  Endlessly.  That’s especially true in the Trump era (coverage and questions about reactions to tweets are ubiquitous), but the phenomenon long pre-dates the current president.  Republican politicians are constantly asked to condemn comments that have been made not only by fellow officials, but also pundits and right-wing celebrities.  It is difficult for me to comprehend how thick the walls of one’s bubble must be if one genuinely believes that a grave fault of the mainstream media is its unfair treatment of Democrats.

Continue reading at townhall.com

Comments

comments