Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson testifies: "I do not hold a position on whether individuals possess natural rights." (From response to post-hearing written questions.) pic.twitter.com/NwH9vjsTLr
— Ed Whelan (@EdWhelanEPPC) April 1, 2022
Here's the link to KBJ's written responses: https://t.co/2vlzV3WzY9
Her statement that she has no position on whether individuals possess natural rights is on 79th page (in answer to question 16 from Senator Cruz).
— Ed Whelan (@EdWhelanEPPC) April 1, 2022
That’s disqualifying.
— America First (@America00983474) April 1, 2022
An instant no vote. Right here. Argue her poor sentencing record all you want, but having no position on rights being natural? Keep this woman far, far away from SCOTUS. https://t.co/TLvT8phMJl
— The🐰FOO (@PolitiBunny) April 2, 2022
Every junior high student knows "that we are endowed by our creator with certain unalienable rights."
— Dan Roth (@Dan12R) April 2, 2022
WTF???? And she (but I am not a biologist) is supposed to defend the Constitution https://t.co/FIFIZXEffi
— USMC3048 (@drabyUSMC) April 2, 2022
The entire foundation of our system of government is the existence of natural rights. That’s why we have a Bill of Rights.
How the hell can a judge who doesn’t hold that truth be to self-evident possibly serve on a Supreme Court that adjudicates those rights? https://t.co/MQhN7WIQAD
— Hammerjack (@MarcGiller) April 2, 2022
![First Black Woman Nominee To Supreme Court Can't Define Woman: "I'm not a biologist" [VIDEO]](https://www.libertybugle.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/23jackson-260x137.jpg "First Black Woman Nominee To Supreme Court Can't Define Woman: \"I'm not a biologist\" [VIDEO]")
